Rereading Herman Melville’s The Confidence-Man: His Masquerade
(1857) left me with a familiar, nonplussed feeling: what in the world did I
make of this book when I read it at twenty or twenty-five or whenever it was?
Melville’s
ninth and last novel happened to be published on April 1st, the day
on which the book’s action takes place. Melville is not subtle about his Ship
of Fools situation on a riverboat, the Fidèle,
bound downstream from St. Louis to New Orleans. The narrator introduces a
succession of men who separate other passengers from their money and whose
theme is confidence, which expands
from the idea of simple trust to include charity, fellow-feeling, optimism, and
generally what keeps society going. A seemingly crippled black man who calls
himself Guineau, a man wearing mourning in his hat, a man in a grey coat, and a
florid man carrying a book are the first apparent manifestations of the
confidence-man.
A
snake-oil salesman—actually he sells the Samaritan Pain Dissuader and
Omni-Balsamic Reinvigorator—is there for a few chapters, suddenly departing the
salon and then returning to give half his earnings to charity in the form of a
man with a bandaged face. The salesman turns into the Natural Bone-setter when
interviewing a crippled man on deck who tells him one story of his crippling,
hobbles away to beg with another story, and comes back. The herb-seller gives
him several boxes of his ointment, but the cripple insists on paying. Next the
salesman sells a box of his herbs for two dollars—instead of the 50 cents he’s
been charging—to an old coughing miser who invested his money with the man with
the book.
A Missouri
frontiersman shows up. “Because a thing is nat’ral, as you call it, you think
it must be good. But who gave you that cough? Was it, or was it not, nature?”
he says to the old man. He expresses the cynical view about confidence. Knaves
and fools are like horses and oats—there are more of the latter, and they get
eaten by the former. “You are the moderate man, the invaluable understrapper of
the wicked man,” he says to the herb-doctor when the latter will not commit to
being an outright abolitionist.
The herb-doctor
leaves at Cape Girardeau and is replaced by a “round-backed, baker-kneed man”
with a brass plate around his neck engraved PIO, for, he says, Philosophical
Intelligence Office. He talks the frontiersman, after “Tusculan Disputations,”
into giving him three dollars plus passage money to send him a boy in two weeks
(the frontiersman has admitted he keeps trying boy after boy, to the tune of
thirty), and then the PIO man goes ashore at Cairo. “Confidence is the
indispensable basis of all sorts of business transactions. Without it,
commerce…would, like a watch, run down and stop” he says as he is going. Such
talk about the necessity of confidence is the constant tune of the
confidence-men in this book, and it is, any reasonable person must admit, true.
The irony that those who preach confidence are least worthy of our bestowing it
on them does not mean that living without trust is a prudent, much less humane,
way of proceeding.
A sort
of parti-colored Harlequin figure that the narrator sometimes calls the
Cosmopolitan, sometimes the Philanthropist, who is soon identified as Frank
Goodman, engages with the frontiersman next, and we suspect him for a fraud
when he says he never could abide irony. When the frontiersman leaves, a young
man in a purple vest, later identified as Charles Arnold Noble, proceeds to
compare the frontiersman with an Indian-hater named Colonel Moredock, for
several chapters. Charles invites Frank to a glass of wine, and drinks very
little himself. When Frank asks Charlie for a loan of fifty dollars, Charlie
acts as if he’s been bitten by a snake.
A
chapter intervenes in which the narrator intrudes to defend the verisimilitude
of his characters. Then Frank tells the story of Charlemont, who at 29 suddenly
turned from affable to morose. Charlie leaves, and a cold stranger warns Frank
against him. A “crazy beggar” interrupts them and gets a shilling from Frank,
nothing from the cold one, who says Charles is “a Mississippi operator”—that
is, a confidence-man. The cold one, whose name is Mark Winsome (he refers to
himself in the 3rd person), has disciples, and introduces one of
them, Egbert, to Frank and then leaves. Frank asks Egbert to play his old
friend Charlie in a dialogue, then asks him for a loan. Egbert/Charlie refuses
with many specious excuses, some connected with the “philosophy” of Mark
Winsome. Then he says the experience of China Aster would dissuade him from the
loan. We have to have the story then, and the movement of the book sometimes
resembles that of the Thousand Nights and
a Night in this respect of succeeding characters and stories that must be
immediately told. China Aster was a candle-maker destroyed by accepting “a
friendly loan.” The cosmopolitan rejects the cold philosophy of Mark Winsome
and his disciple. Then he proceeds to cheat the barber out of a shave by
getting him to take his “no trust” sign down.
In the
last chapter, the cosmopolitan, disturbed at finding the quotations casting
doubt on his optimism and trust (quoted to him by the Mark Winsome disciple) in
the bible, has an old man point out to him that they are in the Apocrypha. The cosmopolitan
brings up the verse in Proverbs, “For the Lord shall be thy confidence.” As the
lamp light wanes he leads the old man to his berth, with the suggestion that “Something
further may follow of this Masquerade.”
There
really is nothing hypocritical about the cosmopolitan’s optimism about trust
and confidence as a feature of human beings—or such an attitude as expressed by
any of the earlier manifestations of the confidence-man on the Fidèle. Such confidence is the necessary
condition for their plying their livelihood. And there seems to be the
suggestion that the person who is never fooled by the con man is lacking
something human. Trust is the necessary condition of business, as the PIO man
points out. It may also be a necessary condition for most human interaction.